Essay On Trump Move To End Daca And Calls On Congress To Act

Trump Moves to End DACA and Calls on Congress to Act On September 5, 2017, Michael D. Shear and Julie Hirschfeld Davis wrote the article, Trump Moves to End DACA and Calls on Congress to Act. On this day, President Donald Trump said that he would be putting an end to the DACA Program that was created during Barack Obama’s Presidency. President Trump is now discussing the issue of revoking DACA due to his early comments in the election about immigration laws, â€Å"The announcement was an effort by Mr. Trump to honor the law-and-order message of his campaign, which included a repeated pledge to end Mr. Obama’s immigration policy, while seeking to avoid the emotionally charged and politically perilous consequences of targeting a sympathetic group†¦show more content†¦The authors are able to avoid logical fallacies by only giving out the needed information and quoting necessary people. Overall, the article gives accurate information that readers will find necessary about what President Trump wants to do with the DA CA program. The authors are able to incorporate both stances on the DACA issue, by doing this, they are able to prevent strong or discernible biases of the topic. Shear and Davis included both stances by quoting opposing people’s opinions. For example, they quoted President Donald Trump, who intends to revoke DACA, he says that the reason for his concern about DACA is, â€Å"the millions of Americans victimized by this unfair job system.† But the authors also quote former President Barack Obama, who helped create the DACA program, when he heard of Trump’s plan he stated, â€Å"Whatever concerns or complaints Americans may have about immigration in general, we shouldn’t threaten the future of this group of young people who are here through no fault of their own, who pose no threat, who are not taking away anything from the rest of us.† The quotes are able to give the reader an unbiased perspective of the topic. Criticism is only shown in the article when the aut hors quote other people, either criticizing DACA or criticizing the people trying to revoke it. Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions criticize DACA, but Mark Zuckerberg, Marielena Hincapie, and

Huckleberry Finn Sweet Home Mississippi Free Essays

Christian Morganstern once explained, â€Å"home is not where you live, but where you understand yourself† (Morgenstern 1). The transcendentalist finds his home, and therefore himself, not in civilization, but in nature. In Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck runs away from his â€Å"civilized† home to the Mississippi River to seek refuge. We will write a custom essay sample on Huckleberry Finn: Sweet Home Mississippi or any similar topic only for you Order Now Much like Thoreau going to Walden’s pond to escape the corruption of society, Huck finds solace on the river. Only when he goes ashore does the peace and tranquility of the River get interrupted by people and society. Ironically, they travel down the Mississippi toward the corrupt slave culture of the pre-Civil War South. The journey on the river symbolizes Huck’s escape from the immorality of society into an idealistic, or utopian home on the raft where he can develop his own moral beliefs while the southward direction represents the ultimate inescapability of society. Although the Mighty Mississippi represents Huck’s sanctuary, it ironically propels Jim and him southward toward the very slave culture they are trying to escape. Resembling Marlow’s adventure on the Thames in Joseph’ Conrad’s The Heart of Darkness, the Mississippi transports Huck toward evil. While traveling into the Heart of Darkness, â€Å"the air was dark above Gravesend, and farther back still seemed condensed into mournful gloom, brooding motionless over†¦ † (Conrad 1). Although the circumstances differ, the idea that they are traveling down hints that they are bound for hell or in the direction of evil. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn the evil they are headed towards is slavery. As they travel down the river, the world around them becomes increasingly chaotic. In the antebellum South, Huck witnesses this disarray first hand when Colonel Sherburn shoots Boggs. Sherburn explains to Huck that people â€Å"in the South†¦ think [they] are braver than any other people–whereas [they’re] just AS brave, and no braver. Why don’t juries hang murderers? Because they’re afraid the man’s friends will shoot them in the back, in the dark–and it’s just what they WOULD do† (Twain 149). This passage is Twain making a reference to the Ku Klux Klan. He vicariously speaks through Sherburn, a Northerner, to convey with judgments of the corrupted South. As Huck travels further South, Twain†¦ However, as long as Huck and Jim stayed away from civilization, they were untouched by the evils of society. This suggests that maybe it is not the direction they are headed, but rather the people who lived upon the shores that are evil. As long as they stay on the raft, their own little lifeboat, Huck and Jim were untouched by the wickedness that dwelled around them. Thoreau, a Transcendental author, reinforces this reverence for nature when he explains that â€Å"Nature [is] not our foe, but an ally, not a dark force to be beaten back, but a marvelous force to be admired† (Garner 1). Nature acted as a sanctuary for Huck, and he felt more at home on the Mississippi than with the unethical people of society. Whenever Huck leaves his raft, his symbolic Walden sanctuary, and came to shore, he ran was faced with the corruption of society. The first time this occurred is when they met the King and the Duke. Not long after, Huck realizes that â€Å"these liars warn’t no kings nor dukes, at all, but just low-down humbugs and frauds,† but puts up with them for Jim’s protection (Twain 128). These two men would put on shows and con people out of their money and then run away. As soon as Huck could, he planned on leaving them behind so Jim and he could go back to their peaceful times on the river. In addition, when floating down the river Huck is able to define his own morals away from the pressures of society. The river is not just an unknowing, unfeeling body of water, but becomes the catalyst to assist Huck with his moral growth. He learns that â€Å"a sound heart is a surer guide than an ill-trained conscience† and that he should listen himself and not the ways of his more civilized elders (Hammond 3). Over the coarse of the novel, Huck finds a home and his morals while traveling down the Mississippi River. Although the people on the shores try to civilize and make him conform to their evil ways, he refuses because the river has become his asylum. How to cite Huckleberry Finn: Sweet Home Mississippi, Papers

Research story free essay sample

Elizabethan Feminist Independence and Freedoms The character of Elizabeth Bennett portrays startling unique and individualistic personality traits throughout her story in Jane Students Pride and Prejudice. Indeed, Austin uses Elizabethan frank nature to challenge traditional notions of gender. Unlike other romantic heroines, Austin chooses to depict Elizabeth as a level headed, deductive, and observation individual who is objectively distant from her social world. Thus, Pride and Prejudice challenges traditional notions of female stereotypes through the actions of Elizabeth Bennett. From the very start of the novel, Austin makes it clear that Elizabeth is an original character that is different from other female counterparts. Although Elizabeth resides in a family with four other daughters, her father makes it known that he favors her when he states, They have none of them much to recommend them, they are all silly and ignorant, like other girls; but Lezzy has something more of quickness than her sisters (Austin 4). We will write a custom essay sample on Research story or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The quickness in mind comes from the close personal relationship that Elizabeth shares with Mr.. Bennett. In her article The Humiliation of Elizabeth Bennett, Susan Frisian wows how this father-daughter relationship shapes and empowers Elizabeth. Many of Mr.. Bonnets socially aloof traits remain imprinted on his daughter because of Elizabethan close personal relationship. Frisian describes Elizabeth as Mr.. Bonnets heir, because he bequeaths to Elizabeth his ironic distance from the world, his habit of studying and appraising those around him, his role of social critic (357). Both characters are content to isolate themselves away from their social world. While Mr.. Bennett retreats to his library, Elizabeth remains objective in forming romantic legislations. It is important to note the similar characteristics that Elizabeth and Mr.. Bennett share. Elizabeth herself is able to manifest these objective and individualistic traits in her attempt to assert herself. Elizabeth is an unconventional character because she is able to act in an unfeminine manner. For instance, while her sisters decided to visit Jane in a Cambridge, Elizabeth chose to walk cross-country. As Austin explains, Elizabeth, feeling really anxious, was determined to go to her, though the Cambridge was not to be had; and as she was no horsewoman, walking was her only alternative. She declared her resolution (24). The reason that Elizabeth chose to walk was simply out of convenience. She did not mind being unaccompanied nor crossing the treacherous territory. Elizabeth merely chose to assert her freedom and independence upon her sisters. Knowing that they would take a detour, Elizabeth chose the fastest option: to walk to the mansion. However, as Austin denotes, Elizabeth continued her walk alone, crossing field after field at a quick pace, Jumping over stiles and springing over puddles with impatient activity Finding herself with rare ankles, dirty stockings, and a face glowing with the warmth of exercise (24). Tired, but satisfied over her accomplishment, Elizabeth demonstrates to her hosts her independent nature. The mark of dirt and grime worn on her dress indicates her symbols of freedom. Again, the only reasons Elizabeth can partake in these kinds of relations are due to the close paternal relationship she shares with her father. According to Frisian, Through her father, Elizabeth gains provisional access to certain authorial powers Because seen is less a daughter than a surrogate son, by paving up her mother and giving in to the father, she reaps the spoils of maleness (358). Thus, Elizabeth is able to adopt male characteristics (ex. Speaking up, romping through muddy areas, abstaining from romantic relationships) because of she emulates her fathers characteristics of social isolation and objectivity. Austin describes Elizabeth as her novels sharpest and wittiest characters. However, Austin still chooses to revolve the majority of her plot around the theme of marriage. Elizabeth herself is included in the romantic courting attempts occurring between characters. Austin shows three characters (Mr.. Hickman, Mr.. Dared, and Mr.. Collins) who demonstrate romantic interest in her protagonist. Nevertheless, Elizabeth is quick to shut down all advances from potential suitors. Austin even provides Elizabeth with a scathing response to Mr.. Collins repeated advances when she states, l am perfectly serious in my refusal. You could not make me happy, and I am convinced that I am the last woman in the world who would make you so (80). Elizabeth obviously fed up with Mr.. Collins audacity and aggression, chooses to provide the latter with a frank and honest answer. Austin, throughout the novel, shows Elizabeth having no mercy when speaking her mind to other characters. She does not concern herself with rank and privilege, only with what she sees as the truth. Even the eloquent Mr.. Dared is at a loss of words for Elizabethan verbal proficiency. Frisian notes that Each time Dared opens his mouth; he is superseded by a speech of greater length and vehemence where Elizabeth answers his question with a tougher question of her own (361). Thus, Elizabeth is able to challenge conventional gender stereotypes through her ability to engage in conversation and skillfully reject proposals made by unsuitable individuals. Students Pride and Prejudice erodes gender stereotypes because of its titular character Elizabeth Bennett. The protagonist is able to express her individuality and frankness thanks in part to the close relationship she shares with her father. Elizabeth is able to emulate her fathers objectivity into her own way of seeing the world. A sense of empowerment through this view allows Elizabeth to be brutally honest with any character she deals with. She is able to look past her societys pressure to conform and see the wider picture of the ridiculousness of her sister and others desire for marriage. Essentially, Austin uses Elizabeth as an interchangeable character who is able to move in and out of her social universe. As Frisian describes, Elizabeth gains access to forms of power through her father. Thus, Elizabeth serves as an exemplary erode of sexist stereotypes. Works Cited Austin, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. New York: W. W. Norton Company, 2001. Print. Frisian, Susan. The Humiliation of Elizabeth Bennett. Pride and Prejudice: A Norton Critical Edition (3rd Deed. ). Deed. Donald Gray. Newark: W. W. Norton company Inc, 2001. 356-368. Ring. Course: ENGLE 1001 (Literature Composition 1) Student: Bikini Lieder student 100048917 Instructor: Stanley File: ENGLE 1001 UDDER 3 Date submitted: June Compare and contrast the marital or romantic relationships in To Room Nineteen by Doris Leasing and Cathedral by Raymond Carver. Marriage: a legally, religiously, or socially sanctioned union of persons who commit to one another, forming a familial and economic bond (http://dictionary. Reference. Com/ browse/marriage). It can be argued that marriage is the relationship that has the greatest impact in our lives. From how our children will look and behave, to where we choose to live, marriage shapes and influences all aspects of our existence. My review will focus on comparing and contrasting the marital relationships in To Room Nineteen by Doris Leasing (1919) and Cathedral by Raymond Carver (1988). Specifically, I will compare how in each story the wife feels dismayed with her husband and married life in general, and contrast how the husband deals with their wifes aloofness and emotional distance. In To Room Nineteen, the wife Susan Railings gradually declines from a happily married woman (arguably the model wife ND mother in her circle of friends and relatives) to a tragic figure who commits suicide because she cannot escape her demons. After her last two children finally leave the house to attend school, Susan is left to herself; however, she unable to truly be carefree and alone to concentrate on herself. The following passage shows how removed she has become from her husband, unable to tell him her deepest feelings and fear: She looked at the handsome blond man, with his clear, intelligent blue- eyed face, and thought: Why is it I cant tell him? Why not? (Leasing, 875). Another excerpt that shows her inability to articulate her true feelings is her debating whether or not to admit what she has been doing in the hotel room for the past year She sat wondering how to say For a year now Vive been spending all my days in a very sordid hotel room. Its the place where I am happy. In fact, without it I dont exist. (Leasing, 887) Unfortunately, she lies and claims to be also having an affair, a shallow attempt at trying to spare his feelings. Similarly, the wife in Cathedral conceals the true nature of her actions from her husband, indicating a lack of trust ND fulfillment in the marriage. She maintains an odd correspondence with a blind man that she once worked for many years ago; her relationship with this man spans across two marriages and the method of communication is via audiotape . She explains to her husband the blind mans plight and how they are strictly Just friends; however, her behavior indicates otherwise when he finally arrives at their home. She gushes over Richard (the blind man) and embraces him as he exits his cab. The niceties continue as the converse, l have winter in my beard now, he said. So Vive been told anyway. Do I look distinguished, my dear? the blind man said to my wife. Muff look distinguished, Robert, she said. Robert, she said. Robert, its Just so good to see you. (Carver, 209-210). The husbands behavior and response to their wifes antics are markedly different from one story to the other. In To Room Nineteen, the husband Mathew willfully allows his wife to escape into her miserable solitude, by agreeing to all of her demands. For example, he allows her to hire a foreign exchange student to help out around the house, even though they have a longstanding maid named Mrs.. Parkers. Essentially the husband is exploiting his whites mental health issues tort his own gain: to have an affair and remove his responsibilities at home as a father. Conversely, the husband in Cathedral is loyal and genuinely cares about his wife to the point where he can be seen as Jealous. He questions her relationship with her blind male friend, but eventually concedes and trusts his wife and strikes a connection with the man. Marriage can bring about great Joy and terrible misery; as partners, husband and wife should be open and engage in honest communication. In both of these stories he wives yearned for more from their husbands; ultimately, the husband in Cathedral took the better approach and grew as a person and positively influenced his marriage. Unfortunately, Mathew failed to help his wife from her tailspin and she ended up committing suicide. Words Cited Carver, Raymond. Cathedral. The Norton Anthology of Short Fiction. Deed. R. Bausch, R. Classical. New York, 2006. 206-216. Leasing, Doris. To Room Nineteen. The Norton Anthology of Short Fiction. Deed. R. Bausch, R. Classical. New York, 2006. 867-890. (http:// dictionary. Reference. Com/browse/marriage) accessed June 30, 2013